Canadian sex

However, some provinces did collect this information.During British Columbias first year of legalized same-sex marriages, 3.5 per cent of the marriages were same-sex marriages and of these, 54.5 per cent were female couples.

Canadian sex-84

Canada was the fourth country to permit same-sex marriages, after the Netherlands (2000), Belgium (2003) and Spain (2005).

While marriage itself falls under federal jurisdiction in Canada, the provinces regulate the solemnization of marriage (the formal ceremony that is either civil or religious) and grant marriage licenses.

In 2005, the federal , a religious official cannot be legally compelled to perform same-sex marriages if it is contrary to their religious beliefs.

At the same time, government does have a duty to provide access to civil marriage (as opposed to a religious marriage ceremony) for those same-sex couples who want to marry Originally it was difficult to determine the full number of same-sex marriages in particular regions because some of the provinces did not specify, in their licensing documents, the genders of the people getting married.

More than one-quarter (27.6 per cent) included women who had previously been married, while 14.2 per cent included men who had had previously been married.

In 2003, Canada was the only country in the world that allowed same-sex marriages between people who were not Canadian residents, and during that year, 5 per cent of the same-sex marriages involved non-residents, although the vast majority (95 per cent) did live in Canada.

“I think there are still myths about how sexual assault victims should react.

But we don’t know how the Ghomeshi case would have turned out if there had not been the inconsistencies in the evidence of the complainants,” she says.

Since the release of , there have been a number of legislative reforms to enhance the protection of complainants.

The Supreme Court has also issued other significant rulings in the area of sexual assault, especially in the area of consent.

In an overview of the law of sexual assault and the need both to encourage reporting of this crime and to ensure that myths about complainants are not part of the analysis conducted by a trier of fact, Chief Justice Beverley Mc Lachlin made these comments: “[T]he reality is that evidence of sexual conduct and reputation in itself cannot be regarded as logically probative of either the complainant’s credibility or consent . The majority decision written by Mc Lachlin, just two years after she was appointed to the Supreme Court, formed the basis for future Criminal Code amendments in this area that are still the law today.

Tags: , ,